Missing/Incomplete/Invalid prior treatment documentation.
Code type
RARC (Remark)
Category
Documentation
Common CARC pairings
RARCs like N683 ride alongside CARCs on the 835 electronic remittance advice. These are the CARC denials RARC N683 is most often paired with.
| CARC | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 163 | Attachment/other documentation referenced on the claim was not received. |
| 250 | The attachment/other documentation that was received was the incorrect attachment/document. The expected attachment/document is still missing. At least one Remark Code must be provided (may be comprised of either the NCPDP Reject Reason Code, or Remittance Advice Remark Code that is not an ALERT). |
| 251 | The attachment/other documentation that was received was incomplete or deficient. The necessary information is still needed to process the claim. At least one Remark Code must be provided (may be comprised of either the NCPDP Reject Reason Code, or remittance Advice Remark Code that is not an ALERT). |
| 252 | An attachment/other documentation is required to adjudicate this claim/service. At least one Remark Code must be provided (may be comprised of either the NCPDP Reject Reason Code, or Remittance Advice Remark Code that is not an ALERT). |
| P30 | Payment denied for exacerbation when supporting documentation was not complete. To be used for Property and Casualty only. |
See the full resolution workflow for RARC N683
Members of the EDI-Code Intelligence Lab get the step-by-step rework path, appeal language, root-cause drivers, and prevention checklist for every RARC and CARC pairing, plus payer-specific quirks.
Open in EDI Lab